| |
[ Download
as PDF ]
UNED Forum, April 2001
Suggestions for a
CSD-10 decision on the multi-stakeholder dialogues for the preparatory meetings
towards Earth Summit 2002 *
The
UN General Assembly, in its resolution A/RES/55/199 (20 December 2000) on the
"Ten-year review of progress achieved in the implementation of the outcome
of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development",
"12. Encourages
effective contributions from and the active participation of all major groups,
as identified in Agenda 21, at all stages of the preparatory process, in
accordance with the rules and procedures of the Commission on Sustainable
Development, as well as its established practices for the participation and
engagement of major groups; (…)
19.
Stresses that the preparatory meetings and the 2002 Summit itself should
be transparent and provide for effective participation and inputs from
Governments and regional and international organizations, including financial
institutions, and for contributions from and active participation of major
groups, as identified in Agenda 21;"
The UN
Commission on Sustainable Development has pioneered multi-stakeholder engagement
with the UN with the CSD Multi-stakeholder Dialogues, which have informed the
deliberations of the Commission on different topics since 1998. Internationally,
the Dialogues represent the most advanced multi-stakeholder discussions within
the UN system on sustainable development issues.
This tradition
should be developed further in the process towards Earth Summit 2002.
Stakeholder dialogues give civil society voices, not votes. The following
suggestions are meant to make those voices as effective as possible, in order
to: raise awareness of the Earth Summit 2002 process among stakeholders and the
general public; ensure informed decision-making through acquiring substantial
contributions from all Major Groups; ensure Major Groups participation a
transparent and inclusive manner; and build commitment and partnerships which
will further the implementation of agreements reached at the Summit.
Process for
multi-stakeholder dialogues and thematic round tables
To achieve these
goals, the multi-stakeholder dialogues at the Regional and International
Preparatory Meetings and the Global Thematic Round Tables should be designed and
conducted based on the following principles and steps:
 |
Approach all
Major Groups asking for their active engagement in the process towards Earth
Summit 2002; |
 |
Clarify the role
of the dialogues and the global thematic round tables and their linkages
with the intergovernmental decision-making process; |
 |
Work with a
steering group of representatives of all Major Groups, as identified
(elected, appointed) by the Major Groups, throughout the process; |
 |
Ensure
transparency of the processes through ensuring wide consultations within
Major Groups' constituencies and publishing minutes of consultations to
Major Groups; |
 |
Enable
meaningful participation by supporting Major Groups through the trust fund,
including equitable access to all relevant information and participation at
meetings; |
 |
Ensure
publication of information on the process, issues and outcomes to all
stakeholders and the general public. |
Preparations
 |
Identify the
issues on the basis of consultations with the steering group, with a view to
put precise questions before the stakeholders; |
 |
Identify the
respective participating Major Groups for each dialogue or round table in
consultation with the steering group, based on a careful analysis of which
are the most significant stakeholders (key actors, key affected groups);
non-participating stakeholders should be informed about procedures and
outcomes; |
 |
Ask Major Groups
to identify their respective representatives at dialogues through
transparent processes within their constituencies; |
 |
Ask Major Groups
to submit background documents well in advance, outlining problem areas,
possible solutions, relevant institutions, and possible partnerships for
implementation; publish these background documents on the UN website for
2002; provide or commission analysis of the background documents well in
advance, identifying commonalities and differences; |
 |
Allow sufficient
time for preparations, including for consultations within Major Groups
constituencies; time tables should be agreed among those participating in
the process. |
Dialogues
 |
Dialogues should
be held at the beginning of meetings and enable governments to participate
(no parallel negotiating sessions); |
 |
Dialogues should
be chaired with a view to identifying common ground among stakeholders and
encouraging partnerships for implementation of possible agreements; |
 |
Dialogues should
be documented in Chair's Summaries to be put forward to subsequent
negotiations; participating stakeholders should be consulted when finalising
the summaries. |
Issues for multi-stakeholder
dialogues at PrepComms and global thematic round tables
With regard to
identifying the issues to be addressed by the multi-stakeholder dialogues at the
International PrepComms, we suggest the following process for the 2nd
– 4th international PrepComms:
 |
The CSD
Secretariat should approach all Major Groups asking for their active
engagement in the process towards Earth Summit 2002, and conduct processes
of identifying priority issues for the Summit within their constituencies in
the most inclusive, transparent, and equitable manner, and ensuring regional
and gender balance. These should follow a common format (problem areas;
possible solutions; institutional framework; possible achievements for the
Summit), and be submitted by September 2001. They should be analysed by
November 2001 to identify commonalities and overlaps, which shall be the
issues discussed at the dialogue sessions; |
 |
Multi-stakeholder
dialogues at the 2nd International PrepComm in January 2002
should focus on discussions on common priority issues. This should include
all Major Groups and can be organised in two or three sessions to avoid
impractically large numbers of participants; |
 |
Multi-stakeholder
dialogues at the 3rd PrepComm in March 2002 should focus on
priority issues as identified in the official process; |
 |
Multi-stakeholder
dialogues at the 4th PrepComm should focus on priority issues as
identified in the official process, and include a Dialogue Session with
Ministers; |
 |
Multi-stakeholder
dialogues at the Summit itself should focus on a small number of priority
issues as addressed by the Summit; these should include all Major Groups but
not necessarily the same Major Groups in all dialogue sessions; |
 |
With regard to
the multi-stakeholder dialogues at the 3rd and 4th
International PrepComms, decisions on which Major Groups should participate
should be made on the basis of (a) a careful analysis of which ones are the
most significant with regard to a particular issue, and (b) consultations
with all Major Groups. |
The issues to be
addressed by the multi-stakeholder dialogues at the Regional PrepComms should
be identified through consultations with steering groups of regional Major
Groups representatives, with a view to addressing emerging priority issues in
the regions (national and regional reports).
The issues to be
addressed by the global thematic round tables should be identified
through consultations with the steering group of international Major Groups
representatives.
* UNED
Forum has been working on developing a methodological framework, principles and
a step-by-step guide for multi-stakeholder processes (MSPs). The draft report
will be discussed at an international workshop (New York, 28/29 April).
Contact:
Minu Hemmati (minush@aol.com) and Felix Dodds
(fdodds@earthsummit2002.org). All
material is available at www.earthsummit2002.org/msp.
[ Download
as PDF ]
|