












| |
[
Download in PDF ]
Freshwater
Issue Advisory Group (IAG) meeting Rueschlikon, Switzerland
Friday
26th April 2002, 5-9pm
Persons
present:
IAG
Members
Achim
Steiner, IUCN
Al
Fry, WBCSD
David
Boys, Public Sector International
David
Nunley, International Development Enterprises
Gourishankar
Ghosh,
Water
Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council
Graham
Brown, Unilever
Jennifer
Francis, Gender & Water Alliance
Jim
Lamb, Severn Trent
Khalid
Mohtadullah, Global Water Partnership
Masato
Toyama, Secretariat of the 3rd World Water Forum
Marcella
de Souza, Watershed Organisation Trust
Maria
de
Lourdes Davies Freitas, IMAH Brazil
Sarah
de Villiers Leach, RandWater
Stephen
Lintner, World Bank
Stephen
Turner, WaterAid
Jasmin
Enayati (Co-ordinator)
|
Guests
Dagmara
Berbalk, German Federal Ministry of Environment, Nature Conservation and
Nuclear Safety
Daniel
Wiener, ecos ag
John
Roberts, Global Water Report
Thomas
Streiff, Swiss Re
Others
Anna
Heydenreich, University of St. Gallen
Minu
Hemmati, Stakeholder Forum, Implementation Conference Coordinator |
Purpose
 |
To
review and develop the Freshwater Issue Paper (Version 4) and the
Stakeholder Action Plans |
 |
To
discuss participation at the Implementation Conference |
Outcomes
 |
An
agreed framework to take the process forward to the Implementation
Conference (and beyond) |
 |
A
structure that will help us to identify existing partnerships and gaps |
Opening
Remarks from the Group:
(These
are brief notes of initial comments – they do not cover word for word what
participants said – they are recorded to help you with preparing your feedback
on the meeting)
 |
The
timing of the Implementation Conference is essential to achieve best
possible linkage to the official process and enable participants to attend. |
 |
Media
activities: press won’t arrive before the Summit |
 |
The
Bureau for the Summit might decide to use the first week of the Summit to
celebrate Type 2 initiatives |
 |
The
strength of this group is that we are pursuing a common agenda. We
should mobilise that to lobby governments. |
 |
We
should try to capitalise on the tremendous opportunity that the Water Dome
offers and use it as the venue for the Freshwater Strand; this would
demonstrate solidarity with the water community, add value to our process
and create linkages. |
 |
IUCN
would offer their venue (NetCorp) as a possible IC conference venue |
 |
The
role of the IC is to broker initiatives between stakeholders based on
the draft action plans; and to profile new and existing partnerships in the
run-up to Jo’burg by presenting case studies. |
 |
There
is a world of action out there; the IC should profile the enormous amounts
of activities by brokering contacts between organisations and stakeholders |
 |
In
Jo’burg we will be committing ourselves for the next 10 years |
 |
The
Bonn Conference has given us a platform through which we have achieved a
common objective; we have achieved remarkable consensus: our focus is on
delivering water for the poor |
 |
We
are committed to new initiatives that will breathe new life into the Bonn
agreements |
 |
The
IAG will help raising the profile of the IC (hand out material before
conference; check media contacts, eg John Vidal: WaterAid) |
 |
The
IC creates space and a structure, which shall be utilised to step up from
consensus to being partners; the aim is to cross-fertilise between
initiatives and evoke interest |
 |
It
will be helpful to categorise partnerships to have a structure of key
partnerships at key levels. This will enable us to identify gaps and find
the organisations that can fill these gaps |
 |
There
will be vertical and horizontal types (eg twinning) of partnerships
(levels include village, urban, industry, agriculture, regional (urban +
rural), river basin, national, transboundary, global) |
 |
Sub-groups
shall be created to develop partnerships ideas (not everyone has to be
involved in every partnership) |
 |
We
should aim to achieve digestible, byte-size outcomes |
 |
Outcomes
should be presented visually |
 |
Concern
regarding the financing of the demonstrations of partnerships and of
getting participants from all sectors to Jo’burg; different organisations
access different budgets – need for balancing this.
(remark from Jasmin: the aim of achieving equitable representation at the
IC will be handled by Stakeholder Forum (SF)– the event is by invitation;
SF is aiming to raise funds for a - limited - budget for getting people to
the IC and encourages those you can afford to contribute to this) |
 |
The
IC is aiming to attract a diverse range of partners to catalyse
existing initiatives and start acting |
 |
The
IC should provide a forum in which we bring our strengths to bear and
recognise our differences |
 |
The
objective is to promote partnership for ACTION, involve, inspire and expose
the benefits of partnerships |
 |
By
looking at partnerships we are already involving governments |
 |
The
private sector, particularly local entrepreneurs, is a vehicle for efficient
service delivery |
 |
The
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) give us the legitimacy to act |
 |
Partnerships
are our approach to realise the MDGs / our methodology to deliver the MDGs |
 |
The
goals cannot be achieved without IWRM |
FRAMEWORK
FOR
DELIVERING WATER FOR THE POOR
The
IAG decided on the following structure to take the process forward:
Mission
Realise
the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
Principle
through
Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM)
Approach
expanding
partnerships through action
Agenda
How
are partnerships working towards / dealing with the issues?
 |
case
studies (depict partnerships) |
 |
lessons
learnt from case studies |
 |
how
to strengthen initiatives / partnerships |
 |
how
to expand / diversify initiatives / partnerships |
 |
|
 |
Support
/ strengthen existing partnerships (through finding additional partners;
promotion towards governments and the public, attract attention, funding,
and political support, become part of monitoring mechanisms of high
visibility, etc) |
 |
Broaden
/ extend existing partnerships (through finding additional partners) |
 |
Replicate
existing partnerships |
 |
Create
new partnerships
in areas where gaps have been identified |
 |
Audit
of partnerships (desired and ongoing) |
...
Seeking added value !
The
agreement on the mission statement resulted in the following Way Forward:
Action
|
Who
|
When
|
1. Circulate the minutes
from the meeting and the tasks to all members of the IAG – including
those not present
|
Jasmin
|
30
April 02
|
2. Review the documentation and:
-
Propose
partnerships (existing and new)
-
Explain partnerships
-
Give an outline of the
initiative in bullet points (fill in the above framework – briefly)
-
Suggest
possible participants for the IC (partners that would be part of
implementation)
|
All
IAG Members
|
Before
15
May 02
earlier
replies welcome!!
|
3.
Get information regarding
the Water Dome as a venue for the Freshwater strand of the IC
|
Alan
Hall, GWP
|
15
May 02
|
4. Finalise date and
venue for the Implementation Conference and Freshwater Issue Strand
Options include: moving the whole of the IC to the 1st week of
the Summit (beginning of the week, possibly starting during the weekend
24/25); moving only the Freshwater meeting; keeping the IC planned as was
(20-23 August)
|
Stakeholder
Forum
|
asap
|
5.
Arrange for next IAG
meeting at Bali PrepCom
|
Jasmin
|
|
Summary:
As
a result of this meeting we have:
1. Reconsidered the ideal time and venue for the Implementation Conference
2.
Agreed on a common framework / structure which will enable us to create
partnership initiatives to achieve our overall goal of delivering water for the
poor
3.
Revised our approach and constructed an Action Plan to deliver it
[
Download in PDF ]
|