












| |
group picture
ACTION PLAN:
Ecoagriculture
Vision:
To promote the
profile and use of Ecoagriculture, currently defined as “sustainable and
associated natural resource management that embraces and simultaneously enhances
productivity, rural livelihoods, ecosystem services and biodiversity, by
catalysing:
 |
Research and
land-use innovation with farmers and conservationists |
 |
Capacity
building |
 |
Education and
public awareness |
 |
Enabling
policies |
 |
Resource
mobilization |
Proposed Outcomes
 |
Raise the profile
and adoption of land use systems that increase agricultural productivity,
ecosystem services and biodiversity |
 |
Establish
criteria for project measurement and qualification |
 |
Identify policy
bottlenecks and recommend policy frameworks to facilitate the scaling up of
Ecoagriculture use |
 |
Mobilize the
necessary resources to support the implementation of such land management
systems |
Work Programme (Summary)
Specific targets of
the Partnership/Initiative and timeframe for their achievement:
 |
October 2002:
Establish an interim secretariat at the Future Harvest
Foundation |
 |
Early 2003:
Conference and partnership planning meeting (professionally
facilitated) |
 |
Late 2003 / Early
2004:
International experts conference on Ecoagriculture Research and
Policy |
Ongoing:
 |
Create a
multi-stakeholder coalition mandated to implementing their mutually agreed
action plan, roles and responsibilities |
 |
Creation of an
educational, capacity building and outreach component |
 |
Mobilize support
for on the ground projects and communities |
 |
Identify and
publicize model communities |
Key work programme
foci (See Annex 1 below for further details):
 |
Development of
the partnership |
 |
Partner Planning
Workshop |
 |
International
Conference: Late 2003/Early 2004 |
 |
‘On the ground’
Support to
ongoing Ecoagriculture projects and participant communities
Identify and
publicize model communities |
 |
Education and
Capacity Building |
 |
Media and Public
Awareness |
Partner organizations:
Intergovernmental
Organizations:
IUCN, IFAD, FAO, UNEP, UNDP – Equator Initiative (Expression of
Interest)
Research
Organizations:
James Cook University – Australia, University of North Carolina -
Carolina Population Center, Future Harvest Centres: CIAT, IWMI, CIFOR, ICRAF,
ILRI (others to be contacted), Forest Trends, CABI Bioscience, Bionet
International
NGOs:
Future
Harvest Foundation, The Nature Conservancy, International Environment Forum,
South African Human Rights Commission
Science:
International
Council for Science (ICSU)
Trade Unions:
International Federation of Agricultural Producers (IFAP)
Governments:
(possibly create a committee of national sponsors) United States of America (USDA,
USAID), Canada, Mexico, The Netherlands, Belgium
Community
Organizations:
Selected Equator Initiative finalists, Future Harvest Center
Community Partners, Transkei Land Service Organization
Other:
Stakeholder Forum for Our Common Future
ANNEX 1: ECOAGRICULTURE WORK PROGRAMME –
FURTHER DETAILS
1.
PARTNERSHIP
DEVELOPMENT |
PROCESS:
 |
Actively
seek and engage additional partners |
 |
Explore
creation of an ‘ecoagriculture committee’ |
 |
Encourage further engagement of scientists |
|
All
IFAP and
IUCN |
|
2. PARTNER PLANNING WORKSHOP |
AIM:
Initial
meeting, possibly with selected invitees from field projects
(potential
candidates for ‘On the Ground I”). |
PROCESS: PLANNINND AND
LOGISTICS
Early 2003
25-40
people
1-2 days
Follow-up
half-day meeting of core planners for the international conference.
Venue:
Europe or Mexico (tentative) |
Secretariat
(Future
Harvest Foundation) |
|
3.
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE |
AIMS:
 |
To draw
wider attention to ecoagriculture |
 |
To bring
together experts
on ecoagriculture from around the world to |
 |
assess
the current state of ecoagriculture |
 |
develop
a strategy for moving forward. |
AGENDA:
 |
Ambitious, multi-stranded, to encompass abroad spectrum of ecoagriculture
elements, including: |
 |
Examine
existing research and technology |
 |
Review
of ‘on the ground’ examples |
 |
Identification of needs for new technology |
 |
Marketing and certification issues |
 |
Education |
 |
Socio-economics impacts |
 |
Social,
organizational, institutional research |
 |
Transfer
of technology |
 |
Management of estuaries and coastal resources (possibly) |
INTENDED OUTPUTS:
Action
plans, to include
 |
An
information strategy |
 |
Alternative models for ecoagricuture promotion in the field including
synthesis and transfer of information to communities |
 |
US small
farmers grant model; |
 |
FAO
farmer field schools |
 |
Cooperative mechanisms, for example watershed planning and community
cooperation |
|
PROCESS: PLANNING AND LOGISTICS
Date:
Late 2003
/ Early 2004
Venue pre-requisites:
 |
In a
developing country |
 |
Within
the proximity of excellent ecoagriculture examples for field visits. |
 |
Possibly
near a Future Harvest Center – for help with support and logistics.
|
Duration:
1 week,
with an interim one-day field trip (plus other optional field visits before
and after the conference).
Format:
 |
Professionally facilitated (possibly) |
 |
Possibly
preceded by regional mini-conferences |
 |
Linked
if feasible, with important international agency action (e.g., FAO) and
international meetings, such as the September 2003 Parks and Protected
Areas Congress |
 |
Aimed at
facilitating learning, application and synthesis |
Fundraising
for:
 |
Organizational costs |
 |
Sponsorship for developing country participants |
|
|
|
4. ‘ON THE
GROUND I’:
SUPPORT TO
ONGOING ECOAGRICULTURE PROJECTS & COMMUNITIES |
AIMS:
 |
Identify
and develop and index of existing research, conservation, agricultural
development projects, with associated organizations. |
 |
The set
of projects should be highly diversified, in terms of: market &
non-market-oriented; ecoregions; types of farming systems;
large/small-scale farmers |
Key project foci:
 |
“Hotspots” for biodiversity or for ecological degradation. |
 |
Projects
that demonstrate the value of considering biodiversity to farmers. |
 |
Projects
related to long-term benchmark studies, for example Olifant basin, Mekong
Delta, Sri Lanka, to benefit from research information and institutions. |
 |
Potential project support to include filling in gaps, such as biodiversity
assessment or economic assessment. |
 |
‘Adoption’ of a model project, adding missing elements, strengthening the
projects, and providing linkages with useful organizations |
 |
Partnership to also consider developing their own case studies
|
|
PROCESS:
 |
Identify
potential projects |
 |
Consult
with project people at planning meeting regarding needs identification |
 |
Structure conference activities to enable the provision of feedback to
them whilst providing others with an opportunity to learn from them |
 |
Identify
and approach a group of foundations willing to fund a small grants program
to assist these existing projects – although in the long term,
ecoagriculture must be able to be successful without outside, grant
funding. |
|
|
5. ON THE
GROUND II:
IDENTIFY &
PUBLICIZE MODEL COMMUNITIES |
AIMS:
 |
Identify, publicize and share information and best practice examples,
including
vulnerable areas that have avoided degradation
communities that are doing a good job |
 |
Subsistence farmers who are not well-linked but are doing this work for
their own reasons; |
 |
Communities that have attracted recent migrants. |
 |
Develop
criteria for qualifications, regarding agricultural systems and practices.
|
 |
Highlight the work of some projects at the Conference, to serve as a focal
point for discussion and learning. |
|
PROCESS:
 |
Identify
|
 |
Document |
 |
Study |
 |
Disseminate information and learnings |
|
|
6. EDUCATION
AND CAPACITY-BUILDING |
AIMS:
Possible
collaborative activities include:
 |
Development of Ecoagriculture modules for training courses. Partners could
provide curriculum. |
 |
Identify
appropriate training courses in which to use modules |
 |
Work
with farmers’ groups; schools and educators (farmer field school as
model?) |
 |
Catalyse
the development of practitioner handbooks for different ecosystems |
 |
Develop
curricular materials for diverse levels |
 |
Create
videos of successful efforts |
 |
Document
cases on website |
|
|
James Cook
University, IPGRI, ILRI, SANREM, ICRAF. |
7.
MEDIA AND
PUBLIC AWARENESS |
AIMS:
Develop
packageable messages for delivery through:
 |
Radio as
a key medium, esp. in light of unaffordable printed media |
 |
Agricultural Media Professionals (AMPs) - education through dissemination
of information and best practices |
 |
Include
AMPs in regional workshops and the international conference , with
provision of tool kits, press releases etc. |
Develop an
ecoagriculture photo library
Address
and organize outreach to governments.
|
PROCESS:
Develop Information Packet to:
 |
Provide
clarity to partners |
 |
Introduce partnership to others |
 |
Interest
donors |
 |
Distribute at conferences, etc. |
Proposed content:
 |
Interim
ecoagriculture definition, vision statement and mission statement,
emphasizing
Combating hunger
Participatory
Knowledge brokering |
 |
Preliminary list of partners |
 |
Projected activities with tentative dates |
 |
Bibliography |
 |
Photographs of ecoagriculture in practice |
 |
Current
state of ecoagriculture around the world: What’s new, what’s been done and
building on that etc/ |
 |
Connection to Agenda 21, Chap 14; CBD, IUCN, Millennium Goals,
agrobiodiversity definition |
 |
Geographical, Ecological and Social Statement |
|
Link with
AMP Task Force
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experts to include farmers and field conservationists, as well as scientists
and policy analysts. The group should include participants from South
America, Asia, faith-based NGOs, Agricultural Media Professionals etc.
|