![]() |
![]() |
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
Mongolia |
Out of all the
complex challenges the world is facing today the environmental
challenges are truly global, in scope and nature, and they require
equally global response. Since Stockholm, and then Rio the international
community has undeniably made great progress in policy formulation,
standard-setting and institution-building, at both national and
international levels, that have helped advance the understanding and
awareness of sustainable development principles and practices worldwide.
As a new paradigm for achieving social, economic and environmental
well-being, sustainable development has been globally recognized to be a
viable path towards an equitable, just and prosperous society. Yet, the environment
and the natural resource base that supports life on Earth continue to
deteriorate at an alarming rate, including ozone depletion, global
warming, fresh water crisis, deforestation, soil erosion and
desertification, as evidenced from the recent studies, including the
Global Environment Outlook 2000. Moreover, environmental threats resulting
from rapid population growth, accelerating trends of urbanization and
development of mega cities, the unsustainable exploitation and depletion
of biological resources, increasing environmental emergencies, the risk
to human health and the environment from hazardous chemicals, and
land-based sources of pollution are increasingly recognized as issues to
be urgently addressed. The root causes for
global environmental degradation have long been identified as embedded
in social and economic problems such as pervasive poverty exacerbated by
swelling debt burden, unsustainable production and consumption patterns,
and inequity in distribution of wealth. The blueprint of
international action and cooperation for the promotion of sustainable
development, Agenda 21 and other outcomes of UNCED, have been put
in place. Yet, as the Secretary-General points in his Millennium report
"the challenges of sustainability simply overwhelm the adequacy of
our responses". The legitimate
question arises -why? Does the international community, increasingly
seen as a single human family living in a shared global village, have
the capacity to redress the above situation? Technically, the right
answer seems to be -yes. There are resources -financial, human and
technological -to cope with that challenge. The real hard question is
-do we have sufficient political will and sense of solidarity to forge
the genuine partnership needed to erase the staggering discrepancy
between commitments and action. In the final
analysis, the answer to this question has to be affirmative and has to
be supported by practical, meaningful action. My delegation is hopeful
that would be the case at Rio+ 10 conference in 2002. In this regard, I
wish to strongly support the views expressed at the high-level segment
of the seventh session of the Commission on Sustainable Development on
the need of setting clear goals for the l0-year review, including a
global commitment to a renewed North-South partnership and a
higher level of international solidarity to further promote sustainable
development in light of both existing and emerging challenges. With a
view to ensuring sound preparations for Rio+ 10 the General Assembly at
this session should set in motion its preparatory process taking into
account the important recommendations emanated from the recent session
of the Commission on Sustainable Development (N55/120). My
delegation looks forward to actively participating in this exercise at
national, sub-regional, regional and international levels. Of particular
interest to us is the expected regional and thematic Agenda 21 round
tables to elaborate practical proposals and innovative approaches
aimed at expediting progress in the implementation of the Rio
commitments drawing on the considerable experience and expertise of
independent experts in the field of sustainable development. As a country with
extremely low population density, weak infrastructure and high
susceptibility to natural disasters, Mongolia is faced with a host of
sustainable development challenges, including desertification, drought
and deforestation. While Mongolia is the 17th largest country in the
world in terms of its territory, much of the land is unproductive. While
over 40 percent of the country's territory is currently covered by
desert, by and large, 95 percent of the total land is considered to be
highly susceptible to desertification. In addition, droughts covering as
much as 25 per cent of the country's territory occur every two to three
years entailing a costly burden to its fragile economy. Over the last 20
years the forested area has significantly shrunk mainly due to forest
fires and timber production. With a view to tackling these and other challenges and as a follow-up to the Rio Summit Mongolia launched its national sustainable development agenda for the 21 st century up to the year 2020, known as MAP 21 (Mongolian Action Programme for the 21 st century). An extensive preparatory process, consisting of institution-building and awareness-raising activities from grass-root to central levels, where provincial authorities, citizens and NGOs took part in developing local action plans for sustainable development, preceded the elaboration of the national programme. |