of the Group of 77 and China on the Process, Form and Scope for
the 10-year review of progress in the implementation of Agenda
21 and Sustainable Development
Fourth Session of the UN General Assembly requested the Secretary-General to
include the views of member states in a preliminary report, requested by the
Commission on Sustainable Development at its Seventh Session and invited
Governments to submit their views to the Secretariat with a view to provide
guidance to the Secretary-General in preparation of his report. The Group of 77
and China wish to propose the following elements for the ten-year review
process, in addition to submissions by individual members of the Group:
NATURE AND FORMAT
should determine the basic elements for the Rio+10 process. The General Assembly
should elaborate on the form, scope and nature of the process and adopt a
resolution in this regard.
The Group of 77 and China is of the opinion that the ten-year review
conference should be held outside New York, in a developing country, during June
2002 for the duration of one week and the attendance should at least be at
should include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following:
Governments -developing countries, in particular LDCs should be assisted to
participate fully in the conference.
Relevant UN Agencies
Secretariats of the Rio and post-Rio Conventions relevant to Agenda 21
Secretariats of the relevant UN Commissions (Social Development; population and
Development; Status of Women; and Human Settlements)
Major Groups as defined in Agenda 21.
Major groups from developing countries should be assisted to participate
in 'order to ensure a fair balance between developed and developing country
major group representation in the event.
In order to ensure a successful outcome of Rio+10, timeous and
high-quality preparations would be needed. Hence, a substantive preparatory
process, open to all UN members, should precede CSD- 10.
National preparatory processes should include all major
groups and should review the implementation of Agenda 21, focus on successes,
gaps and problem areas and should identify priorities for the future work
programme of the Commission on Sustainable Development.
preparatory processes should be established to determine regional priorities and
identify successes, gaps and obstacles in the implementation of Agenda 21, based
on the outcomes and conclusions reached by the national preparatory processes.
The priorities and elements for the future programme of work, identified during
the region preparatory processes, should inform the global process.
countries would need t ' al and financial assistance from the international
community prepare effectively for and participate in these national and regional
related outcomes of Cairo+5, Beijing+5, Istanbul+5 and Copenhagen+5, should feed
into the review process. The outcomes of the South Summit and the Global
conference on Finance for Development could also add value enrich this process.
Reports from governments, National Councils/focal
points for Sustainable Development
Reports from the relevant UN Agencies
Reports from the Convention Secretaries related to
comprehensive assessment of the implementation of Agenda 21, carried out by the
UN System for en year period since 1992, should be made on the basis of t date
adopted by CSD during this period. An assessment should be made of the
mechanisms established to support the implementation on of Agenda 21, with a
view to improve the coordination and comprehensive implementation of Agenda 21.
Rio+10 process should be action oriented and should focus on the integration of
environment and development and the implementation of Agenda 21. The Conference
should re-activate the global community's support for sustainable development
and sustained economic growth and it d reinforce commitments to Agenda 21.
However, Agenda 21 should not be re-negotiated.
should be a fair balance between issues related to development and environment,
and between the sectoral and cross-sectoral issues of Agenda 21.
the review process, the Rio+1O Conference should confirm the priorities and
emerging issue e focused on during the next ten-year programme. This programme
should be focused, implementable, measurable and enable within this time
framework. The Conference should approve appropriate solutions to the obstacles
and key problems identified during the preparatory process and adopt the
programme of for the next ten years for the improved implementation of A 21.